Roland Roths article deals with the relationship
between social movements and governmental politics, the expectations
and missed opportunities. Though one might expect the implementation
of fundamental movement goals by the red-green government, the interim
review is negative. The government politics does not meet the old movements
goals in various policy fields. That accounts for the fact that politics
is focused on central figures like chancellor Schröder in the SPD
and Joseph Fischer within the Bündnis 90/Die Grünen.
Politic mediation is no longer based on party organizations but on personalized
media presentation. Roth emphasizes that this development does not imply
a decline of public political interest or engagement. Politic has spread
outside the institutions into citizen groups and movements. Whether
this political culture strengthens the political potential is hard to
predict. However, a localizing of political decisions is necessary.
Lothar Probst: Is the
red-green government able to govern Germany? Remarks on the situation
and perspectives of SPD and Bündnis 90/Die Grünen, FJ NSB
4/99, S. 22-31
The conditions for a government change where good, so
why is the performance of the red-green government so poor one year
after they came in office? Lothar Probst questions whether this situation
can explained by the stereotypes of lost elections and insufficient
coordination etc. He assumes more basic reasons for the negative results:
the red-green government came accidentally to power, instead of being
a widely accepted reform alliance and the legislation by the new government
is unprofessional. Bündnis 90/Die Grünen as well as the
SPD are subject to internal struggles about policies and personnel.
The CDU, however, recovered fast from the electoral defeat and gains
new strength. Probst judges the situation as difficult but not hopeless.
Necessary to his mind is a better coordination of alliance affairs and
clear party positions. Corresponding strategies are presented.
Gerd Mielke: 1999
A crucial year for the SPD, FJ NSB 4/99, S. 32-39
Over the course of the social democrats hundred
years old tradition there have been several periods of crucial importance
for the party. The author presents the thesis, that 1999 might be one
of these crucial years for the Social Democratic Party. A deep crisis
of legitimacy among the social democratic electorate, the instability
of the leadership as well as the programmatic crisis indicate such a
significant period in the partys history. All three crises are
closely interwoven and reinforce each other. Improved political coordination,
professional management and a better orchestration of communication
are necessary, but alone cannot solve the problems. The fundamental
problem leading to this crisis are structural in nature. The failures
and shortcoming of the first year can only be overcome by a fast and
courageous resolution of these problems.
Markus Klein: The Year
after. Support for the red- green federal government one year after
the 1998 election, FJ NSB 4/99, S. 40-49
In 1998 a government has been voted out for the first
time in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany by means of parliamentary
elections. The consent to a red-green government was surprisingly large.
The more surprises that one year after the parliamentary elections that
consent declined dramatically. On empirical data basis Markus Klein
analyzes how support for governing parties SPD and Bündnis 90/Die
Grünen has developed and explains the reasons for a decreasing
assent in particular for the SPD. Both personal matters and substantial
aspects like the 630 -DM bill and the law against apparent self-employment
have made electors more and more malcontent. Klein refers to two possible
explanations for the declining consent: on the one hand the development
could be explained by the so called electoral cycle. On the other hand
the growing antipathy maybe due to the separation of the fragile target
group coalition of traditional SPD- electors and modernization orientated
electors of the "Neue Mitte" . According to Klein the dual
strategy now shows unwelcome side effects so that the government has
lost both groups.
Sven Jochem/Nico A.
Siegel: The Dilemma of the "Bündnis für Arbeit"
(Alliance for employment), FJ NSB 4/99, S. 50-60
The government of chancellor Schröder focuses its
policy on the reduction of unemployment. Sven Jochem and Nico Siegel
analyze the constellation and the actors intentions in the "Bündnis
für Arbeit". One main problem derives from the actors
different problem definition resulting in different problem solving
strategies. Furthermore the federal political system with differentiated
fiscal competencies and the complex social system complicate a reform
conception. The authors comment on a to their mind fundamental
problem of the alliance: Up to now all participants tried to reduce
the supply of workers instead of focusing on the increase of employment.
This would mean an intensive discussion of how to promote the emergence
of a service society and a further differentiation of the income structure.
The authors conclude that for including these aspects in a general concept,
an elaboration of the governmental policy is a precondition. In the
"Bündnis für Arbeit" this is not in sight up to
now.